Bill Onasch

KC Labor–Since March 8 2000, Online For Class and Climate Justice

 Week In Review  Comments Off on KC Labor–Since March 8 2000, Online For Class and Climate Justice
Feb 202019

Week In Review 2-Part Extra–‘Green New Deal’

by Bill Onasch

From Little Ice Age to Global Warming

A recent poll conducted by Yale revealedgrowing numbers (73 percent) of Americans now accept that global warming is real. While that is a small step forward, only 62 percent believe warming is driven by human activity. The fall-back position of the ruling class, who can no longer successfully promote denial, is that nothing can be done about “natural” climate change.

Natural climate change, triggered by collision with a rogue asteroid 66 million years ago, led to extinction of three quarters of species while creating the biosphere suitable for humans. We are still vulnerable to wayward asteroids. We know it is inevitable that some day the Sun will go nova and then dark—though probably not for millions of years.

There’s nothing we can do about such cosmic threats. But if we move boldly enough and soon enough we still have a chance to stop pernicious global warming that is part and parcel of global capitalism.


This is not the first time that humans have altered climate. New research offers a macabre explanation of the once puzzling Little Ice Age, from the 15th to 18th centuries. Oliver Milman writes in the Guardian, “European colonization of the Americas resulted in the killing of so many native people that it transformed the environment and caused the Earth’s climate to cool down…”

Ninety percent of the indigenous population of the Western Hemisphere were killed either through occupier violence or European diseases for which they had no immunity. There were 56 million indigenous deaths by 1600. That’s about three times the military fatalities on all sides during World War I. It took many decades of slave trade and colonization to rebuild population levels in the “New World.”

By the end of the 19th century scientists already understood that carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels were collecting in what came to be called a greenhouse belt in the upper atmosphere. Heat that would normally dissipate in to Space was being trapped in the human biosphere. While the pioneer scientists understood the danger this threatened they believed it was so gradual that there was no need for urgency, that it could be tackled over generations.

Renewed Interest

Science attention to climate was diverted by two World Wars sandwiched around a global Great Depression. In the postwar period some scientists—mostly employed by fossil fuel and auto industries—took a fresh look at the greenhouse effect. The corporate scientists were muzzled by their employers—who also had considerable influence in academic science.

The first most Americans heard about global warming came in 1988 when NASA scientist James Hansen—who came to earn the honorary title of Dean of U.S. Climate Scientists—testified before a Senate committee. The energy capitalists soon hired their own scientists to denounce climate change as job-killing junk science. It has taken over three decades to overcome the anti-science of the capitalists. And much irreversible ecological damage has been done over those years.

An Inconvenient Truth

At least one Senator was able to follow Hansen’s testimony. Al Gore had done some post-grad work on the topic. After becoming Bill Clinton’s Vice-President Gore became a

the top U.S. representative on UN climate bodies and treaty negotiations.

Gore played a decisive role at the adoption of the first climate treaty—the 1997 Kyoto Protocol now folded in to the Paris Accord. Everybody recognized it was crucial to get the world’s biggest economy—and at that time the biggest greenhouse polluter—on board. Gore was granted veto power over conference proposals—but had no such authority with his boss in the White House. Even though the delegates accepted all of the U.S. demands, Clinton never submitted the treaty to the Senate.

Gore received the most votes for President in 2000 but a Republican dominated Supreme Court awarded the disputed count in Florida to Bush II giving him an edge in the Electoral College. To his credit, once Gore accepted he was never going to be President he did tackle educating the public about climate change, especially through a book and film of the same title—An Inconvenient Truth. But while a good educator on basic climate science Gore believes the Stock Markets will straighten things out.

No one expected the oilmen Bush/Cheney to do anything positive about climate change—and nobody was surprised. What is remarkable is the expectation that Bush’s successor would be a “green” President—a fallacy still maintained by most leaders of the climate/environmental movements. Let’s review just the environmental low-lights of Obama’s eight years.

> The 2009 UN climate conference in Copenhagen was the first on Obama’s watch. Negotiations appeared to be close for the first meaningful agreement since Kyoto. But then Obama, in the vicinity to pick up his Nobel Peace Prize, showed up unexpected. He insisted on starting over again as he haggled with China and others. The upshot was that nothing new was accomplished.

> Obama was the fracking President. He could brag that he made America the biggest producer of oil and gas in the world. Big release of methane, fiery train wrecks, and a few earthquakes was considered a small price to pay for leaping from energy dependent to energy exporter. Fracking more than canceled out the benefits of more use of wind and solar energy.

> Obama came up with some slight of hand tricks to boost his legacy and deliver a pledge at the Paris conference. He could claim the benefit of cheap fracked gas replacing coal in power plants, while calling on states to develop their own regional emissions quotas and carbon taxes.

> Nearly all of Obama’s piddly green reforms were done through Executive Orders. What can be decreed with a pen can be repealed with a pencil. The current climate change denier occupying the Oval Office is himself fond or exec orders and proud of his calligraphy at the bottom.

In 2016 most climate activists rallied around the campaign of Bernie Sanders who calls himself a socialist but caucuses with the Democrats in the Senate and has now announced his second attempt to be the Donkey nominee for President. Sanders delegates, with the advice of Bill McKibben, got a few green nuggets past the Clinton delegates but climate change got scant attention during the campaign.

Now, just weeks after the convening of this Congress, a Green New Deal has been introduced in both houses of Congress. Neither the concept nor the name is new. The Green Party has used both before and still has resolutions and motivation on the website. But there are some new twists in the latest Democrat offering that deserve attention. I’ll continue this narrative, doctors permitting, next week.

That’s all for this week.

Good & Welfare

Receive notification when a new WIR is posted:

On Twitter

send your name and e-mail address to billonasch[at]

Our sole source of operating income is reader contributions. If you can help please visit the KC LaborDonate page.

Our companion Labor Advocate news blog posts articles of interest to working people Monday-Friday by 9AM Central.

Privacy Policy. We don’t share any information about our readers with anyone else—period.

The original content we provide is copyrighted and may not be reproduced by commercial media without our consent. However, labor movement and other nonprofit media may reproduce with attribution.

© 2019 KC Labor Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

KC Labor For Class and Climate Justice

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on KC Labor For Class and Climate Justice
Dec 312018

Year End Week In Review December 31

by Bill Onasch

Today we celebrate a New Year–and the anniversary of the victory of the Cuban Revolution. I apologize for being later than promised with this WIR. I am pleased to announce that I’m reviving postings on the Labor Advocate News Blog.

Paris Rules

In two of the three years since adoption of the “historic” Paris climate accord global greenhouse gas emissions have risen substantially. Instead of Paris hopes that fossil burning would peak in 2020 it is now feared it may continue to grow until 2030, perhaps even 2040.

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres hit a coffin nail on the head when he told 14,000 delegates and entourage at a recently concluded UN conference,

It is plain we are way off course. We are still not doing enough, nor moving fast enough, to prevent irreversible and catastrophic climate disruption.”

Perhaps the most useful aspect of these conclaves like the one that just met in Katowice, Poland is increased climate coverage on news sites such as the New York Times, Guardian, der Spiegel, and the Los Angeles Times. Here are some examples,


A July 17 New York Times story about India admonished,

In cities that are already scorching hot, temperatures and humidity levels are rising to levels that the human body simply can’t tolerate, researchers warn.”

On October 7 the NYT reported,

A landmark United Nations report paints a far more dire picture of the immediate consequences of climate change than previously thought and says that avoiding damage requires quickly transforming the world economy….

The report, issued on Monday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders, describes a world of worsening food shortages and wildfires, and a mass die-off of coral reefs as soon as 2040 — a period well within the lifetime of much of the global population.”

The denier-in-chief in the White House couldn’t block release of similar dire reports about climate change in the USA compiled by 13 Federal agencies as required by law. But Trump’s toadies in the U.S. delegation in Katowice found allies from Russia, Saudi Arabia, Australia, and Kuwait to prevent COP24 from endorsing these urgent pleas of science.


Nearly the entire agenda in Katowice was devoted to finalizing a Rule Book governing the implementation of the Paris accord. Most of these concern reporting progress—or lack thereof—in reducing carbon emissions in each country. Certainly there is a need for rules—which should have been in place before the delegates left Paris three years ago.

In addition to the lethargic and bungling among the counters there are also some crooks. The same proto-fascist regime in Brazil that protects those who murder indigenous and environmentalists in order to clear-cut the biggest land based carbon sink on the planet also got nabbed for trying to double-count carbon credits for the Amazon.

Of course, accurate record keeping is essential to science and I have more confidence in the honesty and competence of scientists than any other group. On the other hand, the capitalists and their political minions–who are principal reporters of raw data—have not earned the same level of trust. We don’t want our progeny to find the ruling class fiddled the books while the Earth burned.

But rules and records are secondary to the main task emphasized by the IPCC scientists–quickly transforming the world economy.

With the partial exception of Cuba, virtually every country has a capitalist, market economy. Capitalists raise money to invest in ventures that will make even more money. Despite historically low oil prices investment in fossil energy is still more attractive than wind or solar without substantial subsidies. The impact of market measures such as divestment, carbon price, and carbon tax have been negligible.

As Sean Sweeney and John Treat say in this excellent article,

The market-focused approach to climate protection has failed spectacularly. Using ‘sticks and carrots’ policies aimed at the private sector, governments anticipated a surge of new ‘green growth’ investment that would create millions of good jobs. This did not happen. It is now absolutely clear that climate policy must shift in a radically different direction, and unions can help ensure that such a shift occurs as soon as possible.”

Sweeney and Treat are leaders in the global Trade Unions for Energy Democracy. TUED advocates socialization of all energy and operating under workers management in the public—and biosphere—interests.

The Labor Network for Sustainability in the USA recently started backing the trendy Green New Deal promoted by Greens and “leftist” Democrats. I’ll compare the two next time.

That’s all for this year.